4.7 Article

Dynamic wetting failure in surfactant solutions

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 789, Issue -, Pages 285-309

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2015.739

Keywords

coating; contact lines; interfacial flows (free millrace)

Funding

  1. Directorate For Engineering
  2. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1434016] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of insoluble surfactants on dynamic wetting failure during displacement of Newtonian fluids in a rectangular channel is studied in this work. A hydrodynamic model for steady Stokes flows of dilute surfactant solutions is developed and evaluated using three approaches: (i) a one-dimensional (1D) lubrication type approach, (ii) a novel hybrid of a 1D description of the receding phase and a 21) description of the advancing phase, and (iii) an asymptotic theory of Cox (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 168, 1986b, pp. 195-220). Steady-state solution families in the form of macroscopic contact angles as a function of the capillary number are determined and limit points are identified. When air is the receding fluid. Marangoni stresses are found to increase the receding-phase pressure gradients near the contact line by thinning the air film without significantly changing the capillary-pressure gradients there. As a consequence, the limit points shift to lower capillary numbers and the onset of wetting failure is promoted. The model predictions are then used to interpret decades-old experimental observations concerning the influence of surfactants on air entrainment (Burley & Kennedy, Chem, Engng Sci., vol. 31, 1976, pp. 901-911). In addition to being a computationally efficient alternative for the rectangular geometries considered here, the hybrid modelling approach developed in this paper could also be applied to more complicated geometries where a thin air layer is present near a contact line.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available