4.4 Article

The influence of status and the social environment on energy stores in a social fish

Journal

JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages 1321-1334

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.12890

Keywords

colony; cooperative breeding; dispersal; liver; muscle; Neolamprologus pulcher

Funding

  1. NSERC
  2. Ontario Innovation Trust
  3. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  4. Journal of Experimental Biology Travelling Fellowship
  5. McMaster School of Graduate Studies
  6. Canadian Society of Zoologists
  7. E. B. Eastburn Postdoctoral Fellowship
  8. Ohio State University Fish Systematics Endowment
  9. SciFund Challenge
  10. American Academy of Underwater Sciences
  11. Animal Behaviour Society
  12. Margo Wilson and Martin Daly Ontario Graduate Scholarship
  13. Canada Research Chairs Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores how muscle and liver energy stores are linked with social status and the social environment in Neolamprologus pulcher, a cooperatively breeding fish that lives in colonies comprised of up to 200 distinct social groups. Subordinate muscle energy stores were positively correlated with the number of neighbouring social groups in the colony, but this pattern was not observed in dominant N.pulcher. Furthermore, liver energy stores were smaller in dominants living at the edge of the colony compared with those living in the colony centre, with no differences among subordinates in liver energy stores. Subordinate N. pulcher may build up large energy stores in the muscles to fuel rapid growth after dispersal, which could occur more frequently in high-density environments. Dominant N. pulcher may use the more easily mobilized energy stores in the liver to fuel daily activities, which could be more energetically demanding on the edge of the colony as a result of the increased predation defence needed on the edge. Overall, this study demonstrates that both subordinate and dominant physiology in N. pulcher varies with characteristics of the social environment. Furthermore, dominant and subordinate energy storage strategies appear to differ due to status-dependent variation in daily activities and variation in the need to prepare for future reproductive or dispersal opportunities. (C) 2016 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available