4.4 Article

Trophic structure of a coastal fish community determined with diet and stable isotope analyses

Journal

JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY
Volume 89, Issue 3, Pages 1513-1536

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.13059

Keywords

delta C-13; delta N-15; fish diet; food webs; north-west Atlantic; trophic ecology

Funding

  1. Rhode Island Ocean Special Area Management Plan
  2. Commercial Fisheries Research Foundation's Southern New England Cooperative Research Initiative
  3. Roger Williams University Foundation
  4. University of Rhode Island

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A combination of dietary guild analysis and nitrogen (N-15) and carbon (C-13) stable-isotope analysis was used to assess the trophic structure of the fish community in Rhode Island and Block Island Sounds, an area off southern New England identified for offshore wind energy development. In the autumn of 2009, 2010 and 2011, stomach and tissue samples were taken from 20 fish and invertebrate species for analysis of diet composition and N-15 and C-13 signatures. The food chain in Rhode Island and Block Island Sounds comprises approximately four trophic levels within which the fish community is divided into distinct dietary guilds, including planktivores, benthivores, crustacivores and piscivores. Within these guilds, inter-species isotopic and dietary overlap is high, suggesting that resource partitioning or competitive interactions play a major role in structuring the fish community. Carbon isotopes indicate that most fishes are supported by pelagic phytoplankton, although there is evidence that benthic production also plays a role, particularly for obligate benthivores such as skates Leucoraja spp. This type of analysis is useful for developing an ecosystem-based approach to management, as it identifies species that act as direct links to basal resources as well as species groups that share trophic roles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available