4.6 Review

Health equity guiding frameworks and indices in injury: A review of the literature

Journal

JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH
Volume 82, Issue -, Pages 469-481

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.07.001

Keywords

Injury; Framework; Index; Health equity; Social determinants of health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to explore the guiding frameworks and indices for health equity and assess their application in injury research. A total of 60 relevant frameworks and indices were identified through literature search and knowledge. The study found that there were many frameworks and indices for measuring health equity, but there were few injury-related meta-analysis and systematic review articles.
Background: In early 2021, CDC released the CORE Health Equity Strategy, which resolves to integrate a comprehensive health equity approach to the work of the Agency. One priority of the Injury Center's Division of Injury Prevention is to move health equity research in injury forward. The purpose of this research is to perform an initial exploration of health equity guiding frameworks and indices to better understand which of these has been applied to injury research topics. Methods: A PubMed and CINAHL search of meta-analysis and systematic review articles was conducted from January 1998 through April 2022. Articles of any type and additional frameworks/indices were also identified from staff knowl-edge of the literature. Books were also considered, where accessible. The following areas were reviewed for each resource: population addressed, guiding framework/index, other health equity variables, gaps identified, and whether the articles addressed an injury topic. Findings: The PubMed/CINAHL search pro-duced 230 articles, and an additional 29 articles and 8 books were added from previous knowledge of the literature, resulting in a total of 267 resources for review. There were 60 frameworks/indices compiled that were relevant to health equity. Out of all the resources, three reported on an injury topic and used the PROGRESS-Plus framework, the WHO Social Determinants of Health Conceptual Framework, and a social-ecological framework. Conclusions: This study found there were many frameworks/indices for mea-suring health equity; however, there were few injury-related meta-analysis and systematic review arti-cles. Some frameworks/indices may be more appropriate than others for measuring health equity in injury topic areas, depending on which social determinants of health (SDOHs) they address. Practical Applications: Measuring health equity in injury and other public health research areas can help build a foundation of evidence. Moving forward, injury researchers can consider the frameworks/indices identi-fied through this study in their health equity injury research.(c) 2022. National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available