4.6 Article

Trade, Resource Use and Pollution: A Synthesis

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages 861-901

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-022-00713-x

Keywords

Country type; Environmental stock; Long-run gains from trade; Pollution; Resource extraction; World specialization pattern

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [16H03617, 20H01492]
  2. Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study (HIAS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a two-sector dynamic model on trade and the environment, examining the impact of the resource-good and manufacturing sectors on the environment and the environmental and welfare consequences of trade.
We develop a two-sector dynamic model of trade and the environment. Both resource-good and manufacturing sectors generate environmental burdens that can adversely affect the environment in a country over time. The resource-good sector is environmentally sensitive, with its productivity suffering in line with declines in the environmental stock. Countries can be categorized into two types: one in which the resource-good sector is more environmentally harmful than the manufacturing sector, and another in which the opposite is true. At every point in time, labor allocations and specialization patterns under free trade are dependent on country size, technology, household preferences, and environmental stocks. Trading countries' types have implications for the dynamics of environmental stocks and the corresponding environmental and welfare consequences of trade. If two trading countries are of the same type, one country exports its dirtier goods and the other must export its cleaner goods; consequently, at least one country gains from trade. If the two countries are of different types, they can export their respective dirtier goods and may both lose from trade.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available