4.5 Article

Acceptability of Prednisolone in an Open-Label Randomised Cross-Over Study-Focus on Formulation in Children

Journal

CHILDREN-BASEL
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/children9081236

Keywords

acceptability; paediatric medicine; drug formulations

Categories

Funding

  1. A.P. Moller Foundation [17-L-0204]
  2. Captain Lieutenant Harald Jensen
  3. Wife Foundation
  4. Danish Medical Research [2017-1064/51]
  5. Aase and Ejnar Danielsens Foundation [18-10-0366]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developing suitable medicines for children is a complex task that requires consideration of various factors. Acceptability remains a challenge, even for older medicines. This study investigated the acceptability of different prednisolone formulations in pediatric patients and found a significant difference in acceptability between whole tablets and crushed tablets. This poses a problem for long-term treatment and young children who cannot swallow tablets. Improving age-appropriate and acceptable formulations is necessary.
Developing acceptable medicines for children is a complicated task. Several factors must be considered, including age, physiology, texture preference, formulation, and legal framework among others. In the development of new paediatric medicines, these factors are assessed. However, for older medicines, e.g., prednisolone, acceptability is still a challenge. This study was an open-label randomised three-arm cross-over study investigating different formulations of prednisolone (crushed tablets, whole tablets, and oral solution) in paediatric patients with asthma and asthma-like symptoms. Participants were randomised into two different formulations on two consecutive days. For each formulation, the child or caregiver was asked to evaluate acceptability using a modified five-point Wong Baker Face scale. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) model was used to test for significance. For the 41 children, included mean age was 4.7 years (SD +/- 3.6), and mean weight was 21 kg (SD +/- 10.8). Sixty-one percent were boys. The participants were divided accordingly into three age groups: 6 to 23 months (N = 11), 2 to 5 years (N = 14), and 6-11 years (N = 16). The overall acceptability was low, with only 23 out of 71 scores rating the treatment either 1 or 2 (32%). The ANOVA test showed a significant difference in acceptability score between crushed tablets and whole tablets (p < 0.003). The mean acceptability score for the crushed tablet was the least favourable at 3.9 compared to oral solution (3.1), oro-dispersible tablet (2.8), and whole tablets (2.4). This is problematic in long-term treatment and for the youngest children who cannot swallow tablets. The improvement of age-appropriate and acceptable formulations is necessary.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available