4.2 Article

Impact of machined versus structured implant shoulder designs on crestal bone level changes: a randomized, controlled, multicenter study

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1186/s40729-022-00432-4

Keywords

Implant design; Machined vs. rough implant collar; Peri-implantitis; Peri-implant bone level

Funding

  1. Bego Implant Systems

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the influence of collar region architecture on marginal bone and soft tissue response in dental implants. The results showed that there were no significant differences in bone loss, soft tissue response, and implant survival rate between implants with machined and roughened necks.
Purpose: The collar region of an implant is its connection to the oral cavity. A balance between osseointegration on one hand and the absence of plaque accumulation on the other hand is necessary for successful implantation. It is yet to be determined which implant collar design, polished or rough, is best to stabilize the crestal bone level, avoiding peri-implantitis and subsequent risk of implant loss. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the architecture of the collar region on marginal bone and soft tissue response. Methods: This prospective, randomized, clinically controlled multicenter study included 58 patients undergoing dental implant treatment using a pair of dental implants with either machined or rough-surfaced shoulder regions. Patients were clinically and radiologically examined for bone level height and signs of inflammation after 6, 12 and 24 months. Results: No implant was lost within the 2 years of follow-up (100% survival rate). No significant differences on crestal bone loss (machined neck: 0.61 mm +/- 0.28 mm, rough neck 0.58 mm +/- 0.24 mm) and on soft tissue response (probing depth 3-6 mm with bleeding on probing 7.6% in machined-neck implants and in 8.3% in rough neck implants) were observed between implants with machined and roughened neck after 2 years. Conclusions: Machined and roughened neck implants achieved equally good results concerning peri-implant bone loss, the rate of peri-implantitis and implant survival rate/hard and soft tissue integration. None of the two collar designs showed a clear advantage in peri-implant reaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available