4.7 Article

Preparation and characterization of B, S, and N-doped glucose carbon dots: Antibacterial, antifungal, and antioxidant activity

Journal

SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES
Volume 32, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.susmat.2022.e00397

Keywords

Carbon dots; Doping with heteroatoms; Fluorescence; Broad-spectrum antimicrobial; Antioxidant

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [2019R1A2C2084221]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon dots are prepared by doping with heteroatoms to enhance functionality. They show excellent antioxidant and antibacterial properties, with low toxicity to cells even at high concentrations.
Carbon dots are prepared using glucose as a carbon source (GCD) and doped with heteroatoms such as boron, sulfur, and nitrogen to enhance their functionality. FTIR and XPS results confirm doping of GCDs with heteroatoms, and their particle size is ~10 nm, as shown by TEM images. GCDs are very hydrophilic and stable in an aqueous solution, and nitrogen-doped GCD (NGCD) exhibits the highest polydispersity index of 0.274. The GCDs show excellent tunability of the PL emission with the variation in excitation wavelength. All the GCDs display excellent antioxidant function with the highest activity in the NGCD. The boron-doped GCD (BGCD) and sulfur doped GCD (SGCD) exhibit more potent antibacterial activity against E. coli and Listeria monocytogenes. The NGCD is effective against both bacterial strains, showing the highest antibacterial activity. The NGCD exhibits potent antifungal activity against Ammophilus fumigatus, P. citrinum, C. albicans, and R. rubra, while the SGCD has a higher inhibitory effect on the growth of F. solani. Besides, more than 80% of the mouse fibroblast L929 cells are viable even when exposed to a high concentration of 500 mu g/mL for 72 h, indicating low toxicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available