4.4 Review

Neuromodulation in Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Narrative Review

Journal

PAIN AND THERAPY
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 789-816

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s40122-022-00405-w

Keywords

Chronic pelvic pain; Chronic primary pelvic pain syndrome; Neuromodulation; Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation; Sacral nerve modulation; Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

Funding

  1. Young Scientists Fund of China [12002079]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the application of neuromodulation technology in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain, including different types of neuromodulation and their advantages and disadvantages, and emphasizes the comprehensive evaluation of chronic pelvic pain.
Chronic primary pelvic pain syndrome (CPPPS) is a heterogeneous disease with unknown pathogenesis and a lack of distinct pathological features, which complicates diagnosis and therapy and has a significant impact on patients' daily life. Because pharmacological management is ineffective and long-term use may result in additional system damage, developing a more effective treatment is critical. Neuromodulation has advanced rapidly over the last few decades, and various types of neuromodulations have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of CPPPS. In this article we discuss the evolution of neuromodulation technology in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain, its application to various subtypes of chronic pelvic pain, and the comparison of relevant efficacy and parameter differences, as well as assess the relative advantages and disadvantages of sacral neuromodulation, percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation , transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, electroacupuncture, and pudendal neuromodulation. Furthermore, it was noted that chronic pelvic pain should be evaluated in terms of pain, associated symptoms, psychological problems, and quality of life. Although neuromodulation approaches have been shown to be effective in treating chronic pelvic pain, more extensive multicenter trials are required to confirm this.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available