4.4 Review

Invasive intervention timing for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: Late invasive intervention is not late for collection

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES
Volume 10, Issue 23, Pages 8057-8062

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i23.8057

Keywords

Pancreatitis; Walled-off necrosis; Minimally invasive surgery; Endoscopic drainage; Endoscopic gastric fenestration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article mainly discusses the intervention timing for infected necrotizing pancreatitis (INP), suggesting that even in the age of minimal invasiveness, waiting for the necrotic collections to be encapsulated is still necessary.
With the advance of invasive interventions, the treatment model for infected necrotizing pancreatitis (INP) has shifted from open surgery to the step-up minimally invasive treatment. Late intervention, originating from the open surgery era, has been questioned in the minimally invasive period. With the emergence of new high-quality evidence about the timing for intervention, it seems to be increasingly apparent that, even in the age of minimal invasiveness, late intervention waiting for the necrotic collections to be encapsulated is still necessary. This opinion review mainly discusses the intervention timing for INP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available