4.6 Review

Pathophysiology of Pulmonary Fibrosis in the Context of COVID-19 and Implications for Treatment: A Narrative Review

Journal

CELLS
Volume 11, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells11162489

Keywords

pulmonary fibrosis; COVID-19; TGF-beta 1; prevention; treatment

Categories

Funding

  1. Homer Stryker M. D. School of Medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews the literature on pulmonary fibrosis (PF) and its potential outcomes in COVID-19 patients. It discusses the risks and possible consequences of COVID-19 infection on lung function, as well as therapeutic strategies. The aim of this article is to provide a better understanding of the expected long-term outcomes of COVID-19 on lung function.
Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is a feared outcome of many pulmonary diseases which results in a reduction in lung compliance and capacity. The development of PF is relatively rare, but it can occur secondary to viral pneumonia, especially COVID-19 infection. While COVID-19 infection and its complications are still under investigation, we can look at a similar outbreak in the past to gain better insight as to the expected long-term outcomes of COVID-19 patient lung function. In the current article, we review the literature relative to PF via PubMed. We also performed a literature search for COVID-related pathological changes in the lungs. Finally, the paper was reviewed and summarized based on the studies' integrity, relative, or power calculations. This article provides a narrative review that endeavors to elucidate the current understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying PF and therapeutic strategies. We also discussed the potential for preventing progression to the fibrotic state within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. With the massive scale of the COVID-19 pandemic, we expect there should more instances of PF due to COVID-19 infection. Patients who survive severe COVID-19 infection may suffer from a high incidence of PF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available