4.4 Article

Nitrogen Removal in Permeable Woodchip Filters Affected by Hydraulic Loading Rate and Woodchip Ratio

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages 1688-1695

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2015.11.0583

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Danish Strategic Research Council [09-067280]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Unregulated and event-driven agricultural tile drainage discharge poses several challenges that potentially limit the nitrate (NO3) removal performance of woodchip-based wetlands constructed to intercept subsurface tile drain flows. Laboratory column tests were conducted to evaluate the biogeochemical response of mixed reactive media (woodchips-seashells and woodchips-Filtralite mixtures) at two woodchip ratios to changes in hydraulic loading rate (HLR). The tests involved continuous loading of aerated artificial drainage water spiked with NO3-N and tritium ((H2O)-H-3) breakthrough experiments. Flow-normalized NO3 reduction rates ranged from 0.35 to 3.97 g N m(-3) L-1, corresponding to N removal efficiencies of 5 to 64%, depending on HLR and filter mixtures. At high HLRs, oxic conditions prevailed in the woodchip filters, resulting in reduced N removal. At low HLRs, progressively lower pore-water velocities extended the period for consumption of terminal electron acceptors, increasing N removal. When increasing the content of mineral material, N removal declined, probably due to a lower denitrifying biomass at lower woodchip mass. The effect of woodchip ratios on solute transport characteristics was difficult to assess. However, woodchip media including a mineral fraction of crushed seashells demonstrated the highest N removal rates and efficiencies, most likely due to the alkalizing effect of the seashells. In conclusion, filter mixtures consisting of woodchips and seashells were the most effective material for N removal in subsurface flow-constructed wetlands treating agricultural drainage water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available