4.6 Article

Economic Growth, CO2 Emissions Quota and Optimal Allocation under Uncertainty

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 14, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su14148706

Keywords

greenhouse gases; CO2 emission equivalent; environmental Kuznets curve; modern portfolio theory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the connection between greenhouse gas emissions and economic development, proposing an optimal quota for greenhouse gas emissions while considering economic growth. The results support the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis, showing an inverted U-shaped relationship between logarithmic greenhouse gas emissions and logarithmic GDP per capita. By minimizing uncertainty risks and adhering to a specified global economic growth rate, the study suggests a method for determining the best allocation of greenhouse gas emissions. Government policymakers can use this framework to allocate emissions quotas for each sector, ensuring intended levels of domestic economic growth.
This study attempts to link greenhouse gas emissions and economic development, and under the premise of considering economic development, proposes an optimal quota of greenhouse gas emissions. Based on the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis, the logarithmic value of greenhouse gas emissions is an inverted U-shaped function of the logarithmic value of GDP per capita. The empirical results showed that most countries in the world support the Kuznets curve hypothesis. Moreover, using data collected from Our World in Data, the optimal allocation of a greenhouse gas emissions quota can be found by minimizing the uncertainty risk subject to a prespecified global economic growth rate. For government policymakers, they may apply the framework in this study to determine an optimal allocation of greenhouse gas emissions for each sector that will ensure the intended level of domestic economic growth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available