4.3 Article

Economic Growth Targets and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19138053

Keywords

economic growth target; resource misallocation; industrial restructuring; carbon emissions

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71973131]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper explores the impact of economic growth targets on carbon emissions in China and finds that government actions can influence carbon emissions through resource mismatch and industrial restructuring. Therefore, a high-quality performance assessment mechanism should be developed to harness the active role of local governments in achieving carbon reduction goals.
Carbon emissions have become a new threat to sustainable development in China, and local government actions can play an important role in energy conservation and emission reduction. This paper explores the theoretical mechanisms and transmission paths of economic growth targets affecting carbon emissions from the perspective of economic growth targets and conducts an empirical analysis based on 30 provincial panel data in China from 2003 to 2019. The results show that: economic growth targets are positively correlated with carbon emissions under a series of endogeneity and robustness; there are regional heterogeneity, target heterogeneity and structural heterogeneity in the impact of economic growth targets on carbon emissions; after economic growth targets are set, government actions can influence carbon emissions by affecting resource mismatch and industrial restructuring; It is further found that there is a U shaped relationship between economic pressure and carbon emissions. Based on the above findings, this paper further proposes that a high-quality performance assessment mechanism should be developed to bring into play the active role of local governments in achieving carbon reduction goals, and thus contribute to high-quality economic development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available