4.0 Review

Evaluation of the evidence for self-management post-stroke within clinical practice guidelines for people with stroke: A systematic review

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY
Volume 85, Issue 12, Pages 923-946

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/03080226221107768

Keywords

guideline; recommendation; self-management; stroke

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Self-management post-stroke is crucial, but there are significant inconsistencies in self-management recommendations within current stroke guidelines, with varying strengths of underpinning evidence. This article highlights the need for universal consensus on evidence-based self-management post-stroke.
Introduction Self-management post-stroke is essential where healthcare systems are stretched and stroke prevalence remains high. Self-management is recommended in stroke guidelines however, the quality of guidelines can vary and the evidence underpinning recommendations is unclear. The objectives of this paper are to identify and appraise current stroke guidelines, synthesise self-management recommendations and assess the evidentiary basis of these recommendations. Method Stroke guidelines were retrieved from a search of four databases and stroke association websites in July 2021. Four independent reviewers assessed their quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation 2nd Edition instrument. Self-management recommendations were extracted by hand, evaluated, synthesised and the evidence underpinning them appraised using the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations framework. Results Eleven guidelines were included in this systematic review, all of excellent methodological quality overall. One hundred and sixty-one recommendations were extracted from these guidelines and grouped into ten principles of self-management. A quarter of the recommendations were underpinned by level A evidence, 32% level B and 43% level C. Conclusion Although current stroke guidelines are of high methodological quality, there are considerable inconsistencies in self-management recommendations within and between these guidelines, with varying strengths of underpinning evidence. This article identifies a need for universal consensus regarding evidence-based self-management post-stroke.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available