Use of computerised adaptive testing to reduce the number of items in patient-reported hip and knee outcome scores: an analysis of the NHS England National Patient-Reported Outcome Measures programme
Published 2022 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Use of computerised adaptive testing to reduce the number of items in patient-reported hip and knee outcome scores: an analysis of the NHS England National Patient-Reported Outcome Measures programme
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BMJ Open
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages e059415
Publisher
BMJ
Online
2022-07-21
DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059415
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Item selection for 12-item short forms of the knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-12) and hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS-12)
- (2018) B. Gandek et al. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE
- A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty
- (2017) Joel J. Gagnier et al. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY
- Item Response Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing for Orthopaedic Outcomes Measures
- (2016) Dane Jensen Brodke et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS
- Reflections on the national patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) programme: Where do we go from here?
- (2016) Derek Kyte et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE
- Framework and guidance for implementing patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: evidence, challenges and opportunities
- (2016) Ian Porter et al. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
- Why item response theory should be used for longitudinal questionnaire data analysis in medical research
- (2015) Rosalie Gorter et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Patient-reported outcomes: pathways to better health, better services, and better societies
- (2015) N. Black et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- qgraph: Network Visualizations of Relationships in Psychometric Data
- (2015) Sacha Epskamp et al. Journal of Statistical Software
- Overview of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory for the Quantitative Assessment of Items in Developing Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures
- (2014) Joseph C. Cappelleri et al. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
- Can pain and function be distinguished in the Oxford Hip Score in a meaningful way?
- (2014) K. K. Harris et al. Bone & Joint Research
- Comparison of the responsiveness of the SF-36, the Oxford Knee Score, and the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in patients undergoing total knee replacement
- (2013) Yu Ko et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research
- (2013) Bryce B. Reeve et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Can pain and function be distinguished in the Oxford Knee Score in a meaningful way? An exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis
- (2013) Kristina Harris et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Factors associated with non-response in routine use of patient reported outcome measures after elective surgery in England
- (2012) Andrew Hutchings et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Rasch analysis of the Oxford Knee Score
- (2009) Y. Ko et al. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE
- On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha
- (2008) Klaas Sijtsma PSYCHOMETRIKA
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAdd your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload Now