Power and Sample Size Calculations for the Restricted Mean Time Analysis of Prioritized Composite Endpoints
Published 2022 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Power and Sample Size Calculations for the Restricted Mean Time Analysis of Prioritized Composite Endpoints
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 1-21
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Online
2022-08-09
DOI
10.1080/19466315.2022.2110936
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- On recurrent-event win ratio
- (2022) Lu Mao et al. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
- Estimation and modeling of the restricted mean time lost in the presence of competing risks
- (2021) Sarah C. Conner et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Statistical models for composite endpoints of death and non-fatal events: a review
- (2021) Lu Mao et al. Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research
- Sample size formula for general win ratio analysis
- (2021) Lu Mao et al. BIOMETRICS
- On restricted mean time in favor of treatment
- (2021) Lu Mao BIOMETRICS
- Designing clinical trials with (restricted) mean survival time endpoint: Practical considerations
- (2020) Anne Eaton et al. Clinical Trials
- Statistical Considerations for Sequential Analysis of the Restricted Mean Survival Time for Randomized Clinical Trials
- (2020) Ying Lu et al. Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research
- Effect of High-Dose Trivalent vs Standard-Dose Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine on Mortality or Cardiopulmonary Hospitalization in Patients With High-risk Cardiovascular Disease
- (2020) Orly Vardeny et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Design and monitoring of survival trials based on restricted mean survival times
- (2019) Xiaodong Luo et al. Clinical Trials
- Using the Restricted Mean Survival Time Difference as an Alternative to the Hazard Ratio for Analyzing Clinical Cardiovascular Studies
- (2019) Zachary R. McCaw et al. CIRCULATION
- The win ratio: Impact of censoring and follow‐up time and use with nonproportional hazards
- (2019) Gaohong Dong et al. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS
- Sample size and power for the weighted log‐rank test and Kaplan‐Meier based tests with allowance for nonproportional hazards
- (2019) Godwin Yung et al. BIOMETRICS
- On the alternative hypotheses for the win ratio
- (2018) Lu Mao BIOMETRICS
- Estimands and Their Role in Clinical Trials
- (2017) Mouna Akacha et al. Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research
- On the win-ratio statistic in clinical trials with multiple types of event
- (2016) D. Oakes BIOMETRIKA
- Estimands in clinical trials - broadening the perspective
- (2016) Mouna Akacha et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Large sample inference for a win ratio analysis of a composite outcome based on prioritized components: Table 1.
- (2015) Ionut Bebu et al. BIOSTATISTICS
- An alternative approach to confidence interval estimation for the win ratio statistic
- (2014) Xiaodong Luo et al. BIOMETRICS
- Analysing recurrent hospitalizations in heart failure: a review of statistical methodology, with application to CHARM-Preserved
- (2014) Jennifer K. Rogers et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE
- Moving Beyond the Hazard Ratio in Quantifying the Between-Group Difference in Survival Analysis
- (2014) Hajime Uno et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Restricted mean survival time: an alternative to the hazard ratio for the design and analysis of randomized trials with a time-to-event outcome
- (2013) Patrick Royston et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Time to move on from 'time-to-first': should all events be included in the analysis of clinical trials?
- (2012) S. D. Anker et al. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
- The win ratio: a new approach to the analysis of composite endpoints in clinical trials based on clinical priorities
- (2011) S. J. Pocock et al. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
- The use of restricted mean survival time to estimate the treatment effect in randomized clinical trials when the proportional hazards assumption is in doubt
- (2011) Patrick Royston et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Generalized pairwise comparisons of prioritized outcomes in the two-sample problem
- (2010) Marc Buyse STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now