4.8 Article

Waning effectiveness of the third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30884-6

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this retrospective study, the authors demonstrate a significant waning of mRNA vaccine effectiveness against the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 infection within a few months after administration of the third dose of the BioNTech/Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine.
In this retrospective study, authors show that relative protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection wanes from 53.4% one month after vaccination to 16.5% three months after vaccination, suggesting that there is a significant waning of mRNA vaccine effectiveness against infection with the Omicron variant. The duration of protection of the third (booster) dose of the BioNTech/Pfizer BNT162b2 mRNA Coronavirus Disease 2019 vaccine has been the subject of recent investigations, as global discussions around the necessity and effectiveness of a fourth dose are already underway. By conducting a retrospective study implementing a test-negative case-control design, analyzing 546,924 PCR tests performed throughout January 2022 by 389,265 persons who received at least two doses, we find that the effectiveness in each month-since-vaccination decreases significantly. Compared to those vaccinated five months prior to the outcome period, on August 2021, relative protection against infection waned from 53.4% a month after vaccination to 16.5% three months after vaccination. These results suggest that there is a significant waning of vaccine effectiveness against the Omicron variant of the third dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine within a few months after administration. Additional information could assist to comprehensively estimate the effectiveness of the three-dose-strategy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available