4.6 Article

On a Blockchain-Based Security Scheme for Defense against Malicious Nodes in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 22, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22145361

Keywords

vehicular networks; detection of messages; blockchain; consensus mechanism; privacy protection

Funding

  1. Funds for the Key Research and Development Plan Project of Shaanxi Province, China [2022GY-039, 2022GY-030]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a security scheme based on blockchain technology for enhancing the security and efficiency of vehicular ad-hoc networks. By constructing two types of blockchain and considering multiple factors, including reputation of sender nodes and time and distance effectiveness, the proposed scheme is able to identify malicious nodes, detect forged messages, and encourage active behaviors.
Vehicular ad-hoc networks (VANETs) aim to provide a comfortable driving experience. Sharing messages in VANETs can help with traffic management, congestion mitigation, and driving safety. However, forged or false messages may undermine the efficiency of VANETs. In this paper, we propose a security scheme based on blockchain technology, where two types of blockchain are constructed based on roadside units (RSUs) and Certificate Authorities (CAs), respectively. The proposed security scheme has multifold goals to identify malicious nodes and detect forged messages based on multiple factors, such as reputation of sender nodes, and time and distance effectiveness of messages. In addition, an incentive mechanism is introduced on the RSU blockchain to encourage RSUs to adopt active behaviors. Extensive simulations show that the proposed scheme exhibits superior performances to existing methods in detecting forged messages and identifying malicious nodes. Meanwhile, it provides privacy protection and improves the efficiency of vehicular networks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available