4.7 Article

Single-cell sorting of microalgae and identification of optimal conditions by using response surface methodology coupled with life-cycle approaches

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 832, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155061

Keywords

Single-cell sorting; Chlorella sorokiniana sp; ZM-5; Central composite design; Life cycle assessment; Life cycle costing

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Founda-tion Grant [2020M681070]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42071268, 4190711]
  3. Postdoctoral Grants in Heilongjiang Province [LBH-Z20042]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study sorted and enriched a single cell of microalgae and used response surface methodology to determine the optimal growth conditions. Life-cycle approaches were then applied to assess the environmental and economic impacts, showing the potential to reduce both impacts.
Response surface methodology (RSM) has been widely used to identify optimal conditions for environmental microorganisms to maximize degrading pollutants and accumulating biomass. However, to date, environmental impact and economic cost have rarely been considered. In this study, a single cell of microalgae Chlorella sorokiniana ZM-5 was sorted, and its enrichment was carried out for the first time. The optimized conditions by RSM for achieving the highest COD, TN, TP removal and 352.61 mg/g lipid production were 24 h light time, 4.3:1C/N, 7.2 pH, and 30 degrees C temperature, respectively. Life-cycle approaches were then carried out upon this illustrative case, and the results indicated that the implementation of the above optimal conditions could reduce the total environmental impact by 48.0% and the total economic impact by 10.2%. This study showed the feasibility of applying life-cycle approaches to examine the optimal conditions of a biological process in terms of minimizing environmental impact and economic costs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available