4.3 Article

Emollient efficacy and acceptability in the treatment of eczematous dry skin: A double-blind, randomised comparison of two UK-marketed products

Journal

JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 461-466

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/09546634.2015.1136384

Keywords

Doublebase Dayleve gel; Diprobase cream; PVP; hydration; emollients; comparison

Categories

Funding

  1. Dermal Laboratories Ltd, Hitchin, UK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the moisturising efficacy and acceptability of physical characteristics of two commonly prescribed emollients licenced in the UK, Doublebase Dayleve gel (DELP) and Diprobase cream (DIPC). Methods: The study was a double-blind, concurrent bi-lateral comparison in female eczema subjects with dry skin. Results: In Part 1, comparing the area under the curve (AUC) change from baseline corneometer readings over 24 h following single applications of the emollients to the volar forearms of 34 subjects, the AUC for DELP was more than three times that seen for DIPC (p<0.0001). In Part 2, comparing the same outcome measured over 5 days of twice daily applications to the lower legs in 36 subjects, the AUC for DELP was approximately five times that for DIPC (p<0.0001). 69% of subjects Like Slightly or Like Strongly DELP compared to 33% for DIPC (p=0.025). 72% indicated they would use DELP again compared to 33% for DIPC (p=0.033). 75% of subjects preferred DELP, 17% preferred DIPC and 8% expressed no preference (p=0.0004).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available