4.8 Article

Covalence bridge atomically precise metal nanocluster and metal-organic frameworks for enhanced photostability and photocatalysis

Journal

NANO RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 1527-1532

Publisher

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-022-4725-4

Keywords

atomically precise nanoclusters; metal-organic frameworks; covalent binding; photostability; photocatalytic hydrogen production

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a covalence bridge strategy was proposed to effectively connect metal nanoclusters and metal-organic frameworks, resulting in excellent stability and catalytic activity. The synthesized material UiO-66-NH2-Au-25(L-Cys)(18) demonstrated remarkable photocatalytic hydrogen production performance, with high charge transfer efficiency, low overpotential of water reduction, and low activation energy barrier.
Metal nanoclusters (NCs) with precise structure and ultrasmall size have attracted great interests in catalysis. However, the poor stability has limited its large-scale use. Herein, we proposed the covalence bridge strategy to effectively connect atomically precise metal NCs and metal-organic frameworks. Benefiting from the covalent linkage, the synthesized UiO-66-NH2-Au-25(LCys)(18) showed outstanding stability after 16 h photocatalysis. Moreover, the covalence bridge created a strong metal-support interaction between the two components and provided an effective charge transport channel and thereby enhanced photocatalytic activity. UiO-66-NH2-Au-25(L-Cys)(18) displayed an exceptional photocatalytic H-2 production rate, which is 21 and 90 times higher than that of UiO-66-NH2/Au-25(PET)(18) (made by physically combination) and bare UiO-66-NH2, respectively. Thermodynamic and kinetic studies demonstrated that UiO-66-NH2-Au-25(L-Cys)(18) exhibited higher charge transfer efficiency, lower overpotential of water reduction and activation energy barrier compared with its counterparts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available