4.4 Article

Growth optimization and applicability of thick on-axis SiC layers using sublimation epitaxy in vacuum

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRYSTAL GROWTH
Volume 448, Issue -, Pages 51-57

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2016.05.017

Keywords

Mass transfer; Substrates; Single crystal growth; Semiconducting materials

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council [621-2014-5825, 621-2014-5461]
  2. Swedish Energy Agency [38335-1]
  3. Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems (Vinnova) [2013-02983]
  4. Innovation Fund Denmark (LEDSiC project) [4106-00018B]
  5. Vinnova [2013-02983] Funding Source: Vinnova

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We demonstrate growth of thick SiC layers (100-200 mu m) on nominally on-axis hexagonal substrates using sublimation epitaxy in vacuum (10(-5) mbar) at temperatures varying from 1700 to 1975 degrees C with growth rates up to 270 mu m/h and 70 mu m/h for 6H- and 4H-SiC, respectively. The stability of hexagonal polytypes are related to process growth parameters and temperature profile which can be engineered using different thermal insulation materials and adjustment of the induction coil position with respect to the graphite crucible. We show that there exists a range of growth rates for which single-hexagonal polytype free of foreign polytype inclusions can be maintained. Further on, foreign polytypes like 3C-SiC can be stabilized by moving out of the process window. The applicability of on-axis growth is demonstrated by growing a 200 mu m thick homoepitaxial 6H-SiC layer co-doped with nitrogen and boron in a range of 10(18) cm(-3) at a growth rate of about 270 mu m/h. Such layers are of interest as a near UV to visible light converters in a monolithic white light emitting diode concept, where subsequent nitride-stack growth benefits from the on-axis orientation of the SiC layer. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available