4.5 Article

Electronic excitation-induced tunneling and charge-trapping explored by in situ electrical characterization in Ni/HfO2/β-Ga2O3 metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitors

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mseb.2022.115716

Keywords

-Ga 2 O 3; Swift heavy ion (SHI) irradiation; In situ I-V and C-V characteristics; Charge-trapping; Tunneling

Funding

  1. SERB under DST, GoI [PDF/2016/000748]
  2. Department of Science and Technology (DST) , India [3/GaO-Nitrides/2019]
  3. IIT Delhi, India
  4. IUAC Pelletron group, New Delhi
  5. IIT Delhi
  6. UGC-DAE CSR, Indore and Mangalore University for active collaboration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the electrical characteristics of Ni/HfO2/beta-Ga2O3 devices under swift heavy ion irradiation, revealing significant Poole-Frenkel emission at specific fluences. The barrier height and trap energy levels were found to be influenced by irradiation, with an increase in O defects within HfO2 due to electronic excitation.
In situ current-voltage and capacitance-voltage characteristics were performed on Ni/HfO2/beta-Ga2O3 devices using 120 MeV Ag7+ swift heavy ion (SHI) irradiation. The Poole-Frenkel emission is significant within 2.25-7.50 MV/cm until 5 x 1012 ions/cm2 and covers a full range of 0.01-7.50 MV/cm for the fluences of 1 x 1013 and 5 x 1013 ions/cm2 under gate injection. The estimated trap energy level is Ec - 0.73 eV for pristine device whereas Ec - 0.65 eV is for 5 x 1013 ions/cm2. Ni/HfO2 BH is 0.88 eV for the pristine device from Schottky emission. It is found to improve to 1.04 eV until 5 x 1012 ions/cm2 and then decrease to 0.75 eV at 5 x 1013 ions/cm2 due to the athermal annealing. From Fowler-Nordheim tunneling, the BH of Ni/HfO2 interface is 0.78 eV and 0.69 eV at 1 x 1013 ions/cm2 and 5 x 1013 ions/cm2. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy at O 1s reveals an increase in O defects within HfO2 due to electronic excitation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available