4.5 Article

Implant survival and patient satisfaction of reduced diameter implants made from a titanium-zirconium alloy: A retrospective cohort study with 550 implants in 311 patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Volume 44, Issue 12, Pages 1940-1944

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.09.007

Keywords

Dental implants; Patient satisfaction; Resonance frequency analysis; Implant diameter

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the study was to evaluate implant survival of reduced-diameter implants compared to regular-diameter implants. A retrospective evaluation of 154 Straumann Bone Level Roxolid (R) implants (diameter 33 mm) with SLActive (R)-surface in 107 patients, which were inserted between 2009 and 2010 in private practice, was performed. The mean observation period was 22.4 +/- 8.2 months. 396 Straumann SLActive (R) implants (41 mm and 48 mm) in 204 patients, with an observation period of 28.4 +/- 10.1 months served as control group. Implant survival rate, resonance frequency analysis and patient satisfaction were evaluated. The implant survival rate was 97.4% in the test vs. 98.5% in the control group. Resonance frequency analysis showed statistically significant lower values for the reduced-diameter implants. Patient satisfaction showed no significant difference between the test and the control group. Reduced-diameter implants displayed high survival rates during the period investigated and represent a convincing treatment alternative. Long-term follow-up investigations confirmed the high implant survival rates of 96.8% (after 69.7 +/- 12.3 months) in the test group and 98.5% (after 76.0 +/- 13.6 months) in the control group. (C) 2016 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available