4.7 Article

Clinical Evaluation of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Rapid Antigen Tests During the Omicron Wave in South Africa

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 226, Issue 8, Pages 1412-1417

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiac333

Keywords

21K; BA1; 21L; BA2; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; antigen; Omicron; sensitivity; specificity

Funding

  1. Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), the global alliance for diagnostics
  2. European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials partnership (EDCTP) [RIA2020EF-2928]
  3. FIND

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We evaluated the performance of three COVID-19 antigen tests during the Omicron wave in South Africa and found that all tests performed well with high sensitivity and specificity, especially in samples with high viral load and early infection.
We evaluated the performance of nasal and nasopharyngeal Standard Q COVID-19 [coronavirus disease 2019] Ag tests (SD Biosensor) and the Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device (nasal; Abbott) against the Abbott RealTime severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) assay during the Omicron (clades 21M, 21K, and 21L) wave in South Africa. Overall, all evaluated tests performed well, with high sensitivity (range, 77.78%-81.42%) and excellent specificity values (>99%). The sensitivity of rapid antigen tests increased above 90% in samples with cycle threshold <20, and all 3 tests performed best within the first week after symptom onset. The SD Biosensor and Panbio rapid antigen tests performed well in samples with Omicron 21M, 21K, and 21L infections. The Panbio test performed best in infections with Omicron 21L, which had significantly higher viral load than 21M and 21K.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available