4.7 Article

Machine Learning of Coupled Cluster (T)-Energy Corrections via Delta (Δ)-Learning

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages 4846-4855

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00501

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate thermochemistry is crucial in various chemical disciplines, but assessing the thermochemistry of fleetingly existent intermediates is challenging. Computational estimates are needed when direct calorimetric experiments are not feasible, but they are often resource-intensive. By employing graph neural networks, we can predict the effect of perturbatively included triples on molecular energies with high accuracy, achieving a mean absolute error below 0.3 kcal mol(-)(1).
Accurate thermochemistry is essential in many chemical disciplines, such as astro-, atmospheric, or combustion chemistry. These areas often involve fleetingly existent intermediates whose thermochemistry is difficult to assess. Whenever direct calorimetric experiments are infeasible, accurate computational estimates of relative molecular energies are required. However, high-level computations, often using coupled cluster theory, are generally resource-intensive. To expedite the process using machine learning techniques, we generated a database of energies for small organic molecules at the CCSD(T)/cc-pVDZ, CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVDZ, and CCSD(T)/cc-pVTZ levels of theory. Leveraging the power of deep learning by employing graph neural networks, we are able to predict the effect of perturbatively included triples (T), that is, the difference between CCSD and CCSD(T) energies, with a mean absolute error of 0.25, 0.25, and 0.28 kcal mol(-)(1) (R-2 of 0.998, 0.997, and 0.998) with the cc-pVDZ, aug-cc-pVDZ, and cc-pVTZ basis sets, respectively. Our models were further validated by application to three validation sets taken from the S22 Database as well as to a selection of known theoretically challenging cases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available