4.7 Article

Systematic Analysis and Prediction of the Target Space of Bioactive Food Compounds: Filling the Chemobiological Gaps

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING
Volume 62, Issue 16, Pages 3734-3751

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00888

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Consejeria de Ciencia, Universidades e Innovacion de la Comunidad de Madrid, Spain [PEJ-2020-AI/BIO-17904]
  2. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion/Agencia Estatal de Investigacion [PID2021-127318OB-I00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study retrieves and analyzes the interactions between food compounds and human proteins using the FooDB and ChEMBL databases. The results show a low target assignment for the compounds and multiple gaps in the chemobiological space. By using cheminformatic approaches, a higher target assignment is achieved, filling many of the gaps and providing target hypotheses for fast testing.
Food compounds and their molecular interactions are crucial for health and provide new chemotypes and targets for drug and nutraceutic design. Here, we retrieve and analyze the complete set of published interactions of food compounds with human proteins using the FooDB as a compound set and ChEMBL as a source of interactions. The data are analyzed in terms of 19 target classes and 19 compound classes, showing a small fraction of target assignment for the compounds (1.6%) and unraveling multiple gaps in the chemobiological space for these molecules. By using well-established cheminformatic approaches [similarity ensemble approach (SEA) combined with the maximum Tanimoto coefficient to the nearest bioactive, SEA + TC], we achieve a much enhanced target assignment (64.2%), filling many of the gaps with target hypothesis for fast focused testing. By publishing these data sets and analyses, we expect to provide a set of resources to speed up the full clarification of the chemobiological space of food compounds, opening new opportunities for drug and nutraceutic design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available