4.2 Article

Regional Lung Ventilation Analysis Using Temporally Resolved Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages 899-906

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000450

Keywords

lung ventilation; thorax magnetic resonance imaging; shape model segmentation; tissue dynamics

Funding

  1. HOPP-Stiftung in Heidelberg, Germany
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG) [HE 6214/3-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: We propose a computer-aided method for regional ventilation analysis and observation of lung diseases in temporally resolved magnetic resonance imaging (4D MRI). Methods: A shape model-based segmentation and registration workflow was used to create an atlas-derived reference system in which regional tissue motion can be quantified and multimodal image data can be compared regionally. Model-based temporal registration of the lung surfaces in 4D MRI data was compared with the registration of 4D computed tomography (CT) images. A ventilation analysis was performed on 4D MR images of patients with lung fibrosis; 4D MR ventilation maps were compared with corresponding diagnostic 3D CT images of the patients and 4D CT maps of subjects without impaired lung function (serving as reference). Results: Comparison between the computed patient-specific 4D MR regional ventilation maps and diagnostic CT images shows good correlation in conspicuous regions. Comparison to 4D CT-derived ventilation maps supports the plausibility of the 4D MR maps. Dynamic MRI-based flow-volume loops and spirograms further visualize the free-breathing behavior. Conclusions: The proposed methods allow for 4D MR-based regional analysis of tissue dynamics and ventilation in spontaneous breathing and comparison of patient data. The proposed atlas-based reference coordinate system provides an automated manner of annotating and comparing multimodal lung image data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available