4.6 Article

Experimental integrated approach for mechanical characteristic optimization of FDM-printed PLA in an energy-saving perspective

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-022-09535-z

Keywords

PLA; FDM; Sustainability; Mechanical properties; Process parameters; Additive manufacturing

Funding

  1. Universita degli Studi di Napoli Federico II within the CRUI-CARE Agreement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This experimental study investigates the effects of process parameters for 3D printing polylactic acid (PLA) samples on both the mechanical properties obtained and the energy consumption in the fused deposition modelling (FDM) process. The results highlight the printing parameters that mainly affect the mechanical characteristics of the final workpieces and the energy consumption, providing guidelines for an appropriate energy-saving strategy in PLA additive manufacturing process.
This experimental study investigates the effects of process parameters for 3D printing polylactic acid (PLA) samples on both the mechanical properties obtained and the energy consumption in the fused deposition modelling (FDM) process. The explained experimental activities provide an in-depth evaluation of all the strategies adopted in different temperatures and scan speed strategies. The results, extracted in tensile strength, ultrasonic inspection (UT), and specific energy consumption (SEC), highlight the printing parameters that mainly affect the mechanical characteristics of the final workpieces and the energy consumption to find an appropriate energy-saving energy strategy for the PLA additive manufacturing process. The results indicate a more excellent uniformity of the molded material, reducing the printing time and total energy consumption at high speeds (V = 110 mm/s) and one level of temperature (T = 215 degrees C). A new efficiency index has been introduced to release guidelines to pursue the best setup compromise.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available