Journal
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
Volume 48, Issue 7, Pages 899-909Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06745-7
Keywords
Acute pancreatitis; Immunosuppression; Thymosin; Pancreatic necrosis; Infection
Categories
Funding
- Science and technology project of Jiangsu Province [SBE2016750187]
- SciClone Pharmaceuticals Holding Limited
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study aimed to evaluate whether early immune-enhancing Thymosin alpha 1 (T alpha 1) treatment reduces the incidence of infected pancreatic necrosis in patients with predicted severe acute necrotising pancreatitis, but the results showed that this treatment did not reduce the incidence of IPN during the index admission.
Purpose Infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) is a highly morbid complication of acute necrotising pancreatitis (ANP). Since there is evidence of early-onset immunosuppression in acute pancreatitis, immune enhancement may be a therapeutic option. This trial aimed to evaluate whether early immune-enhancing Thymosin alpha 1 (T alpha 1) treatment reduces the incidence of IPN in patients with predicted severe ANP. Methods We conducted a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial involving ANP patients with an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score >= 8 and a computed tomography (CT) severity score >= 5 admitted within 7 days of the advent of symptoms. Enrolled patients were assigned to receive a subcutaneous injection of T alpha 1 1.6 mg every 12 h for the first 7 days and 1.6 mg once a day for the subsequent 7 days or matching placebos (normal saline). The primary outcome was the development of IPN during the index admission. Results A total of 508 patients were randomised, of whom 254 were assigned to receive T alpha 1 and 254 placebo. The vast majority of the participants required admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) (479/508, 94.3%). During the index admission, 40/254(15.7%) patients in the T alpha 1 group developed IPN compared with 46/254 patients (18.1%) in the placebo group (difference -2.4% [95% CI - 7.4 to 5.1%]; p = 0.48). The results were similar across four predefined subgroups. There was no difference in other major complications, including new-onset organ failure (10.6% vs. 15%), bleeding (6.3% vs. 3.5%), and gastrointestinal fistula (2% vs. 2.4%). Conclusion The immune-enhancing T alpha 1 treatment of patients with predicted severe ANP did not reduce the incidence of IPN during the index admission.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available