Do studies published in two leading reproduction journals between 2011 and 2020 demonstrate that they followed WHO5 recommendations for basic semen analysis?

WHO 2021 and 2030 reference values for semen assessment: three challenges for andrology in the journey ahead

(2022) Ana Vasconcelos et al.   REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE

The MDAR (Materials Design Analysis Reporting) Framework for transparent reporting in the life sciences

(2021) Malcolm Macleod et al.   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Self-correction in science: The diagnostic and integrative motives for replication

(2021) David Peterson et al.   SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE

Performance of four chambers to measure sperm concentration: results from an external quality assurance programme

(2020) Emily Zuvela et al.   REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE

Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?

(2018) Daniele Fanelli   PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

A STAR Is Born

(2016) Emilie Marcus   CELL

1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility

(2016) Monya Baker   NATURE

Fifteen years of Belgian experience with external quality assessment of semen analysis

(2016) U. Punjabi et al.   Andrology

Uncertainty of measurement and clinical value of semen analysis: has standardisation through professional guidelines helped or hindered progress?

(2016) M. J. Tomlinson   Andrology

Promoting an open research culture

(2015) B. A. Nosek et al.   SCIENCE

Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?

(2011) Florian Prinz et al.   NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY

Diagnostic tools in male infertility—the question of sperm dysfunction

(2010) Christopher LR Barratt et al.   ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY