4.6 Article

Durability Performance and Service Life of CFCC Tendons Exposed to Elevated Temperature and Alkaline Environment

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000606

Keywords

Durability; Carbon; Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP); Carbon fiber composite cables (CFCC); Elevated temperature; Strength prediction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the physical, mechanical, and durability characterization of Tokyo Rope carbon fiber composite cables (CFCCs). Specimens were exposed to and alkaline solution (12.8pH) for 1,000, 3,000, 5,000, and 7,000h at different elevated exposure temperatures (22, 40, 50, and 60 degrees C) to yield a simulated acceleration of the effect of a concrete environment. The durability performance of the Tokyo Rope CFCC tendons was assessed by conducting tensile tests on the specimens after different exposure periods. In addition, the microstructure of the CFCCsboth conditioned and unconditioned specimenswas investigated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) to assess any changes or degradation. The preexposure and postexposure tensile strengths of the conditioned and unconditioned specimens were used for long-term behavior/performance predictions based on the Arrhenius theory. The test results revealed that the average tensile strength retentions of the conditioned CFCCs could be affected by accelerated time and temperature. According to the predictions, even after a service life of 100years, the tensile strength retention of the tested Tokyo Rope CFCC tendons would still be more than 90% at mean annual temperatures of 50 degrees C (the mean annual temperature and the marine environment of the Middle East and warm regions) and 10 degrees C (mean average temperature of northern regions). (C) 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available