4.7 Review

Histology-agnostic approvals for antibody-drug conjugates in solid tumours: is the time ripe?

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 171, Issue -, Pages 25-42

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.04.039

Keywords

Histology-agnostic; Drug discovery; Drug development; ADC; Regulatory; Clinical trials

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review discusses the challenges and opportunities of pan-histological expansion of ADCs in solid tumors. It covers technological and manufacturing advancements, current evidence from clinical trials, and the need for predictive biomarkers and methodological, statistical, and regulatory considerations in a biomarker-driven histology-agnostic approach.
Several antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have been recently approved to treat solid tumours. Since ADCs seem to have activity in multiple malignancies sharing the expression of a specific antigen, they may be mirroring the experience of histology-agnostic-targeted treatments. So, the possibility to interpret the activity of some ADCs across different cancer types in a biomarker-driven perspective arises. However, relevant biological, methodological, and regulatory challenges should be highlighted and addressed, in order to grant ADCs biomarker-driven regulatory approvals in the next future. In this review, we discuss challenges and opportunities posed by the pan-histological expansion of ADCs in solid tumours. In particular, we provide an overview about technological and manufacturing advancements; we offer up-to-date highlights of the current evidence from clinical trials investigating ADCs in solid tumours; we discuss the need for the identification of optimal predictive biomarkers, as well as major methodological, statistical, and regulatory considerations for a biomarker-driven histology-agnostic approach. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available