4.6 Article

Winter wet-dry weather patterns driving atmospheric rivers and Santa Ana winds provide evidence for increasing wildfire hazard in California

Journal

CLIMATE DYNAMICS
Volume 60, Issue 5-6, Pages 1729-1749

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-022-06361-7

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reveals the close relationship between winter weather variability in California and four atmospheric circulation regimes over the North Pacific Ocean. These regimes result in different weather patterns, some favoring floods and extreme precipitation, while others favor dry conditions and Santa Ana winds. The findings suggest an increasing wildfire hazard in California due to changing weather patterns, while the frequency of historical floods remains unchanged.
Floods caused by atmospheric rivers and wildfires fanned by Santa Ana winds are common occurrences in California with devastating societal impacts. In this work, we show that winter weather variability in California, including the occurrence of extreme and impactful events, is linked to four atmospheric circulation regimes over the North Pacific Ocean previously named and identified as the NP4 modes. These modes come in and out of phase with each other during the season, resulting in distinct weather patterns that recur throughout the historical record. Some phase combinations favor atmospheric river landfalls and extreme daily or multi-day precipitation, while other phase combinations favor anomalously hot weather and drying Santa Ana wind conditions over Southern California. This historical perspective of atmospheric circulation and impacts over 70 years reveals that weather patterns are changing in a way that enhances wildfire hazard in California, while the frequency of weather patterns linked to historical floods is not diminishing. These changes highlight the rising hazards of cascading weather extremes in California's present and future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available