4.5 Article

The many faces of membrane tension: Challenges across systems and scales

Journal

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES
Volume 1864, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2022.183897

Keywords

Membrane tension; Modeling; Helfrich; Curvature; MD simulations

Funding

  1. NIH [R01GM132106]
  2. National Science Foundation, United States [NSF PHY-1748958]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role of membrane tension in membrane biophysics is evolving rapidly from a passive construct to an active player in various cellular phenomena. Membrane tension has been shown to be a key regulator of many cellular processes, including trafficking, ion channel activation, and invasion of red blood cells by malaria parasites. Recent experimental advances have revealed that membrane tension is heterogeneous.
Our understanding of the role of membrane tension in the field of membrane biophysics is rapidly evolving from a passive construct to an active player in a variety of cellular phenomena. Membrane tension has been shown to be a key regulator of many cellular processes ranging including trafficking, ion channel activation, and the invasion of red blood cells by malaria parasites. Recent experimental advances in cells, including the development of a fluorescent tension reporter, have shown that membrane tension is heterogeneous. In this mini-review, I summarize the recent advances in membrane tension measurements and discuss the contributions from different cellular constituents such as the cortical cytoskeleton. Then, I will explore how these different complexities can be considered in biophysical models of different scales. Finally, I will elaborate on the need for iterations between models and experiments as technologies in both fields advance to enable us to obtain critical insights into the physiological role of membrane tension as a critical component of mechanotransduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available