4.7 Article

Scoring System Prognostic of Outcome in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 16, Pages 1864-+

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.0515

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Public Health Service Grant from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) [U24-CA76518]
  2. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  4. NHLBI [5U01HL069294]
  5. NCI
  6. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA/DHHS) [HHSH234200637015C]
  7. Office of Naval Research [N00014-06-1-0704, N00014-08-1-0058]
  8. Allos, Inc.
  9. Amgen, Inc.
  10. Angioblast
  11. Be the Match Foundation
  12. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association
  13. Buchanan Family Foundation
  14. CaridianBCT
  15. Celgene Corporation
  16. CellGenix, GmbH
  17. Children's Leukemia Research Association
  18. Fresenius-Biotech North America, Inc.
  19. Gamida Cell Teva Joint Venture Ltd.
  20. Genentech, Inc.
  21. Genzyme Corporation
  22. GlaxoSmithKline
  23. Kiadis Pharma
  24. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society
  25. Medical College of Wisconsin
  26. Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  27. Milliman USA, Inc.
  28. Miltenyi Biotec, Inc.
  29. National Marrow Donor Program
  30. Optum Healthcare Solutions, Inc.
  31. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc.
  32. Seattle Genetics
  33. Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals
  34. Soligenix, Inc.
  35. Swedish Orphan Biovitrum
  36. THERAKOS, Inc.
  37. Wellpoint, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To develop a system prognostic of outcome in those undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo HCT) for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Patients and Methods We examined 2,133 patients with MDS undergoing HLA-matched (n = 1,728) or -mismatched (n = 405) allo HCT from 2000 to 2012. We used a Cox multivariable model to identify factors prognostic of mortality in a training subset (n = 1,151) of the HLA-matched cohort. A weighted score using these factors was assigned to the remaining patients undergoing HLA-matched allo HCT (validation cohort; n = 577) as well as to patients undergoing HLA-mismatched allo HCT. Results Blood blasts greater than 3% (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.85), platelets 50 3 10(9)/L or less at transplantation (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.61), Karnofsky performance status less than 90% (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.28), comprehensive cytogenetic risk score of poor or very poor (HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.80), and age 30 to 49 years (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.09 to 2.35) were associated with increased hazard of death and assigned 1 point in the scoring system. Monosomal karyotype (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.65 to 2.45) and age 50 years or older (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.36 to 2.83) were assigned 2 points. The 3-year overall survival after transplantation in patients with low (0 to 1 points), intermediate (2 to 3), high (4 to 5) and very high (>= 6) scores was 71% (95% CI, 58% to 85%), 49% (95% CI, 42% to 56%), 41% (95% CI, 31% to 51%), and 25% (95% CI, 4% to 46%), respectively (P < .001). Increasing score was predictive of increased relapse (P < .001) and treatment-related mortality (P < .001) in the HLA-matched set and relapse (P < .001) in the HLA-mismatched cohort. Conclusion The proposed system is prognostic of outcome in patients undergoing HLA-matched and -mismatched allo HCT for MDS. (C) 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available