4.7 Article

Gaussian Processes and Effective Field Theory of f(T) Gravity under the H 0 Tension

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 932, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6ba5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2021YFC2203100]
  2. NSFC [11961131007, 11653002]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities
  4. CSC Innovation Talent Funds
  5. CAS project for young scientists in basic research [YSBR-006]
  6. USTC Fellowship for International Cooperation
  7. USTC Research Funds of the Double First-Class Initiative
  8. Disposizione del Presidente INFN [21786]
  9. COST Association Action Quantum Gravity Phenomenology in the Multimessenger Approach (QG-MM) [CA18108]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we investigate the effective field theory formulation of torsional gravity in a cosmological framework and reconstruct the f(T) form in a model-independent way. By considering observational data and performing fitting using polynomial functions, we find an analytic expression that describes the cosmological evolution in great agreement with observations.
We consider the effective field theory formulation of torsional gravity in a cosmological framework to alter the background evolution. Then we use the latest H (0) measurement from the SH0ES Team, as well as observational Hubble data from cosmic chronometer and radial baryon acoustic oscillations, and we reconstruct the f(T) form in a model-independent way by applying Gaussian processes. Since the special square-root term does not affect the evolution at the background level, we finally summarize a family of functions that can produce the background evolution required by the data. Lastly, performing a fitting using polynomial functions and implementing the Bayesian information criterion, we find an analytic expression that may describe the cosmological evolution in great agreement with observations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available