4.5 Article

Anti Saccharomyces cerevisiae Antibodies in Patients With Anti-2 Glycoprotein I Antibodies

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 818-822

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.21942

Keywords

anti-2 glycoprotein I antibodies; anti Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies; Tunisia

Funding

  1. Unite de recherche: Auto-immunite et Allergie, Faculte de Pharmacie de Monastir, Tunisia [03/UR/07-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundIn this study, cross-reactive epitopes on 2 glycoprotein I and Saccharomyces cerevisiae have been described. The objective of our study was to determine the frequency of anti S. cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA) in patients with anti-2 glycoprotein I antibodies (a2GPI). MethodsA retrospective study was conducted in 77 patients with a2GPI (a2GPI-IgG or a2GPI-IgA). Eighty blood donors were used as a control group. ASCA IgG and ASCA IgA were determined by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). ResultsThirteen patients among 77 had ASCA. ASCA (IgA or IgG) was significantly more frequent in patients than in healthy subjects (16.9% vs. 3.7%, P = 0.01). The positivity of both ASCA IgG and ASCA IgA is higher in patients than in control group (6.5% vs. 0%, P = 0.02). The frequency of ASCA IgG was significantly higher in patients than in the control group (15.6% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.009). In females, the frequency of ASCA IgG was significantly higher in patients than in control group (17.5% vs. 3.7%, P = 0.03). The average titer of ASCA IgG was significantly higher in patients than in the control group (9.7 23 U/ml vs. 2.2 +/- 2.8 U/ml; P = 0.004). ASCA IgG was significantly more frequent than ASCA IgA in all patients (15.6% vs. 7.8%, P = 0.04). ConclusionThe frequency of ASCA was significantly higher in patients with a2GPI than in the control group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available