A third of systematic reviews changed or did not specify the primary outcome: a PROSPERO register study

Title
A third of systematic reviews changed or did not specify the primary outcome: a PROSPERO register study
Authors
Keywords
Bias, Methodology, Quality, Reporting, Systematic reviews, Outcome reporting bias
Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 79, Issue -, Pages 46-54
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2016-04-12
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.025

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reprint

Contact the author

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started