4.5 Article

An integrated on-chip platform for negative enrichment of tumour cells

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.06.016

Keywords

Circulating tumour cells (CTCs); Negative enrichment; White blood cell (WBC) depletion; Magnetic separation; Cell separation

Funding

  1. Science and Engineering Research Council of A*STAR (Agency for Science, Technology and Research), Singapore

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study of cancer cells in blood, popularly called circulating tumour cells (CTCs), has exceptional prospects for cancer risk assessment and analysis. Separation and enrichment of CTCs by size-based methods suffer from a well-known recovery/purity trade-off while methods targeting certain specific surface proteins can lead to risk of losing CTCs due to Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) and thus adversely affect the separation efficiency. A negative selection approach is thus preferred for tumour cell isolation as it does not depend on biomarker expression or defines their physical property as the separation criteria. In this work, we developed a microfluidic chip to isolate CTCs from whole blood samples without targeting any tumour specific antigen. This chip employs a two-stage cell separation: firstly, magnetophoresis depletes the white blood cells (WBCs) from a whole blood sample and is then followed by a micro-slit membrane that enables depleting the red blood cells (RBCs) and retaining only the tumour cells. By creating strong magnetic field gradients along with customized antibody complexes to target WBCs, we are able to remove >99.9% of WBCs from 1:1 diluted blood at a sample processing rate of 500 mu L/min. This approach achieves an average of >80% recovery of spiked tumour cells from 2 mL of whole blood in a total assay processing time of 50 min without multiple processing steps. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available