4.2 Article

Multiple Volatility Real Options Approach to Investment Decisions Under Uncertainty

Journal

DECISION ANALYSIS
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 79-98

Publisher

INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/deca.2021.0449

Keywords

real options; investment; decision making; real option decision tree; natural resources; asset pricing

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a novel multiple volatility real options approach (MVR) to evaluate investment projects. MVR uses a decision tree composed of synthetic tree components to approximate the project value induced by different uncertainties. Through Monte Carlo simulation, MVR generates a multidimensional surface representing enhanced net present value (ENPV) as a function of each uncertainty. MVR provides a more accurate valuation and robust investment decisions.
We present a novel multiple volatility real options approach (MVR) to value investment projects with embedded flexibility and affected by multiple uncertainties. A core innovation is the MVR decision tree composed of MVR synthetic tree components, each reflecting a unique binomial process that approximates a geometric Brownian motion of project value induced by one uncertainty source. MVR uses Monte Carlo simulation to generate volatility of project value log-returns arising from each uncertainty source. MVR produces a multidimensional surface, which is hidden in other approaches, representing enhanced net present value (ENPV) as a function of each uncertainty. It allows the impact of each uncertainty???s volatility on ENPV to be measured through three MVR sensitivity analysis levers. To illustrate MVR, it is applied to a real-world investment project, revealing that MVR provides a more accurate valuation than alternative approaches that do not account for separate impacts of each uncertainty. MVR with its greater veracity, provides robust investment decisions through MVR decision rules.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available