4.3 Article

College student engagement in OER design projects: Impacts on attitudes, motivation, and learning

Journal

ACTIVE LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 353-371

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/14697874221081454

Keywords

21st century skills; digital teaching and learning; open educational practices; open educational resources; soft skills; teaching with technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the impact of actively engaging students as curators and designers of open educational resources (OERs) through project-based learning. Findings indicate that this approach increased students' motivation, improved their attitudes about learning, aided the achievement of course learning objectives, and supported the development of valuable skills for 21st century success.
Open educational resources (OER), which are teaching, learning, and research materials that are openly licensed, are growing in popularity in higher education. Previous studies have focused on faculty and student perceptions and use of OER. In this study, we examined how actively engaging students as curators and designers of OERs through project-based learning as part of an open educational practice shaped students' attitudes, motivation, and learning. This paper presents post-course survey data collected from 69 undergraduate and graduate students from six different courses that featured OER design projects, including: (1) A digital media online course; (2) Online tools for teaching and learning website; (3) History/social studies wiki pages; (4) Campus resources film project; (5) Professional learning networks for educators online course; and (6) Teaching with technology eBook. Findings indicate that shifting students' roles from consumers to curators and creators of OERs increased motivation, improved attitudes about learning, aided the achievement of course learning objectives, and supported the development of valuable skills for 21st century success.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available