4.5 Article

Telocytes: a potential defender in the spleen of Npc1 mutant mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 848-859

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.13024

Keywords

telocytes; spleen; Niemann-Pick disease, type C1; hematopoietic stem cells; macrophages

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31440049, 81400936, 81600987]
  2. Joint Foundation for Fostering Talents of NSFC-Henan Province [U1304808]
  3. Science and Technology Innovation Talents Support Program of Henan Universities [14HASTIT032]
  4. Henan Province University youth researcher support program project [2015GGJS-133]
  5. Scientific Research Fund [162300410134, 162300410232, 14B310007, 142300410192]
  6. support project for the Disciplinary group of Psychology and Neuroscience, Xinxiang Medical University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Niemann-Pick disease, type C1 (Npc1), is an atypical lysosomal storage disorder caused by autosomal recessive inheritance of mutations in Npc1 gene. In the Npc1 mutant mice (Npc1(-/-)), the initial manifestation is enlarged spleen, concomitant with free cholesterol accumulation. Telocytes (TCs), a novel type of interstitial cell, exist in a variety of tissues including spleen, presumably thought to be involved in many biological processes such as nursing stem cells and recruiting inflammatory cells. In this study, we found that the spleen is significantly enlarged in Npc1(-/-) mice, and the results from transmission electron microscopy examination and immunostaining using three different TCs markers, c-Kit, CD34 and Vimentin revealed significantly increased splenic TCs in Npc1(-/-) mice. Furthermore, hematopoietic stem cells and macrophages were also elevated in Npc1(-/-) spleen. Taken together, our data indicate that splenic TCs might alleviate the progress of splenic malfunction via recruiting hematopoietic stem cells and macrophages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available