4.3 Review

The efficacy and safety of fingolimod plus standardized treatment versus standardized treatment alone for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

PHARMACOLOGY RESEARCH & PERSPECTIVES
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/prp2.972

Keywords

acute ischemic stroke; fingolimod; meta-analysis; modified rankin scale

Funding

  1. Doctoral Research start-up fund of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital [2021BS04]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China [2019MS08077]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fingolimod for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The results showed that fingolimod plus standard treatment can reduce infarct growth and improve clinical function compared to standard treatment alone.
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is the most common type of stroke. Fingolimod is a sphingosine analog that acts on sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors (S1PR). Recently, the safety and efficacy of fingolimod in both patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and patients with AIS have been investigated in proof-of-concept trials. In this review, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fingolimod for AIS. This study was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic review and Meta-Analysis) statement. We searched for publications on the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinical trials, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP, CBM up to August 2021. We compiled five studies; a main metaanalysis forest plots were conducted for the values of the proportion of patients whose modified Rankin scale (MRS) score was 0-1 at day 90. There were heterogeneities in each study; the method of sensitivity analysis was performed. A sensitivity analysis was performed with a mean difference (MD) of the efficacy of fingolimod plus standardized treatment versus standardized treatment alone. Random effect model is used for meta-analysis regardless of the I-2 index. The analysis was carried out for categorical variables using the risk ratio (RR), LogRR, and its 95% CI. The methodological quality of each randomized controlled trial (RCTs) was assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration tool to assess the risk of bias (ROB). A meta-analysis of five studies with 228 participants was conducted. The risk ratio of patients whose MRS score was 0-1 at day 90 between fingolimod plus standardized treatment and standardized treatment alone was 2.59 (95%CI, 1.48-4.56). The Fingolimod plus standard treatment group decreased infarct growth and improved clinical function than the standard treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available