Cost-effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulant vs. Warfarin Among Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Intermediate Stroke Risk
Published 2022 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Cost-effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulant vs. Warfarin Among Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Intermediate Stroke Risk
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Online
2022-04-11
DOI
10.3389/fcvm.2022.849474
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Different Oral Antithrombotic Therapy for the Treatment of Ventricular Thrombus: An Observational Study from 2010 to 2019
- (2022) Qing Yang et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE
- Cost‐effectiveness analysis of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and warfarin in the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation in China
- (2021) Hongtao Wei et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulant vs. Warfarin in the Prevention of Thromboembolism in Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation With Valvular Heart Disease—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- (2021) Januar Wibawa Martha et al. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
- A review of global health technology assessments of non-VKA oral anticoagulants in non-valvular atrial fibrillation
- (2020) Renato D. Lopes et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
- Incidence and outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation and major bleeding complications: from the TREAT-AF study
- (2020) Alexander C. Perino et al. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
- Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Vitamin-K Antagonists in the Elderly With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review Comparing Benefits and Harms Between Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials
- (2020) Nan-Nan Shen et al. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Thai Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation
- (2019) Piyameth Dilokthornsakul et al. Heart Lung and Circulation
- Cost-effectiveness of apixaban for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Saudi Arabia
- (2019) Ahmad S. Hersi et al. ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE
- Comparing the Cost Effectiveness of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants with Well-Managed Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Patients at High Risk of Bleeding
- (2018) Alexa R. Hospodar et al. American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs
- Towards Actualizing the Value Potential of Korea Health Insurance Review and Assessment (HIRA) Data as a Resource for Health Research: Strengths, Limitations, Applications, and Strategies for Optimal Use of HIRA Data
- (2017) Jee-Ae Kim et al. JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE
- Cost Effectiveness of Apixaban versus Warfarin or Aspirin for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Greek Perspective
- (2016) Kostas Athanasakis et al. American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs
- Cost-effectiveness modelling of novel oral anticoagulants incorporating real-world elderly patients with atrial fibrillation
- (2016) Ying Jiao Zhao et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
- Cost-effectiveness of edoxaban vs warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation based on results of the ENGAGE AF–TIMI 48 trial
- (2015) Elizabeth A. Magnuson et al. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
- Cost-Effectiveness of Apixaban vs. Other New Oral Anticoagulants for the Prevention of Stroke: An Analysis on Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation in the Greek Healthcare Setting
- (2015) Kostas Athanasakis et al. CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION
- QALYs in cost-effectiveness analysis: an overview for cardiologists
- (2015) Olivier J Wouters et al. HEART
- Trends in Hospitalization for Atrial Fibrillation: Epidemiology, Cost, and Implications for the Future
- (2015) Azfar Sheikh et al. PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
- Clinical and Economic Implications of Apixaban Versus Aspirin in the Low-Risk Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients
- (2015) Gregory Y.H. Lip et al. STROKE
- The Clinical Profile and Pathophysiology of Atrial Fibrillation
- (2014) Jason Andrade et al. CIRCULATION RESEARCH
- Stroke and Systemic Embolism Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Belgium: Comparative Cost Effectiveness of New Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin
- (2014) Thitima Kongnakorn et al. CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION
- Stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation in France: comparative cost-effectiveness of new oral anticoagulants (apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban), warfarin, and aspirin
- (2014) T. Lanitis et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS
- Cost–Effectiveness of Different Strategies for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in a Health Resource-Limited Setting
- (2013) Bin Wu et al. CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS AND THERAPY
- Quality of life after TIA and stroke: Ten-year results of the Oxford Vascular Study
- (2013) R. Luengo-Fernandez et al. NEUROLOGY
- Cost Effectiveness of Treatments for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: Focus on the Novel Oral Anticoagulants
- (2013) Charalampos Kasmeridis et al. PHARMACOECONOMICS
- Cost-Effectiveness of Apixaban Compared with Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation
- (2012) Soyon Lee et al. PLoS One
- Estimation of Total Incremental Health Care Costs in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in the United States
- (2011) Michael H. Kim et al.
- The cost of illness of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of the recent literature
- (2011) S. E. Wolowacz et al. EUROPACE
- Atrial fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review of the incidence, clinical features and prognostic implications
- (2008) J. Schmitt et al. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started