Corneal Biomechanics Differences Between Chinese and Caucasian Healthy Subjects
Published 2022 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Corneal Biomechanics Differences Between Chinese and Caucasian Healthy Subjects
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Online
2022-02-25
DOI
10.3389/fmed.2022.834663
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Title
- (2021) Riccardo Vinciguerra et al. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
- Accuracy of new Corvis ST parameters for detecting subclinical and clinical keratoconus eyes in a Chinese population
- (2021) Shengwei Ren et al. Scientific Reports
- Corneal Stiffness Parameters Are Predictive of Structural and Functional Progression in Glaucoma Suspect Eyes
- (2020) Ayub Qassim et al. OPHTHALMOLOGY
- Corneal biomechanics and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension and controls
- (2019) Riccardo Vinciguerra et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
- Development and validation of a new intraocular pressure estimate for patients with soft corneas
- (2019) Kai-Jung Chen et al. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
- Determination of Corneal Biomechanical Behavior in-vivo for Healthy Eyes Using CorVis ST Tonometry: Stress-Strain Index
- (2019) Ashkan Eliasy et al. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
- Repeatability and comparison of new Corvis ST parameters in normal and keratoconus eyes
- (2019) Kaili Yang et al. Scientific Reports
- Ex-vivo experimental validation of biomechanically-corrected intraocular pressure measurements on human eyes using the CorVis ST
- (2018) Ashkan Eliasy et al. EXPERIMENTAL EYE RESEARCH
- In Vivo Early Corneal Biomechanical Changes After Corneal Cross-linking in Patients With Progressive Keratoconus
- (2017) Riccardo Vinciguerra et al. JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY
- Introduction of Two Novel Stiffness Parameters and Interpretation of Air Puff–Induced Biomechanical Deformation Parameters With a Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer
- (2017) Cynthia J. Roberts et al. JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY
- Integration of Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments for Enhancing Ectasia Detection
- (2017) Renato Ambrósio et al. JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY
- Biomechanical Characterization of Subclinical Keratoconus Without Topographic or Tomographic Abnormalities
- (2017) Riccardo Vinciguerra et al. JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY
- Corneal biomechanical metrics of healthy Chinese adults using Corvis ST
- (2017) Wei Wang et al. Contact Lens & Anterior Eye
- Ethnic differences in lens parameters measured by ocular biometry in a cataract surgery population
- (2017) Dajiang Wang et al. PLoS One
- Ectasia Detection by the Assessment of Corneal Biomechanics
- (2016) Renato Ambrósio et al. CORNEA
- Detection of Keratoconus With a New Biomechanical Index
- (2016) Riccardo Vinciguerra et al. JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY
- Influence of Pachymetry and Intraocular Pressure on Dynamic Corneal Response Parameters in Healthy Patients
- (2016) Riccardo Vinciguerra et al. JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY
- Development and validation of a correction equation for Corvis tonometry
- (2015) Akram Abdelazim Joda et al. COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
- Concepts and misconceptions in corneal biomechanics
- (2014) Cynthia J. Roberts JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
- Discriminant Value of Custom Ocular Response Analyzer Waveform Derivatives in Keratoconus
- (2013) Katie M. Hallahan et al. OPHTHALMOLOGY
- Matched case-control studies: a review of reported statistical methodology
- (2012) Daniel Niven et al. Clinical Epidemiology
- Air-pulse corneal applanation signal curve parameters for the characterisation of keratoconus
- (2011) M. Mikielewicz et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started