4.6 Review

Guide to Metabolomics Analysis: A Bioinformatics Workflow

Journal

METABOLITES
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/metabo12040357

Keywords

metabolomics; metabolomics analysis tools; metabolic pathways summary; multi-omics integration algorithms

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [81872372, 82173034]
  2. 2020 Li Ka Shing Foundation Cross-Disciplinary Research Grant [2020LKSFG07B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metabolomics is an emerging field that aims to identify metabolites corresponding to biological phenotypes and analyze the underlying mechanisms. Integrating different omics data requires specialized statistical and bioinformatics software to obtain a more comprehensive description of biological processes.
Metabolomics is an emerging field that quantifies numerous metabolites systematically. The key purpose of metabolomics is to identify the metabolites corresponding to each biological phenotype, and then provide an analysis of the mechanisms involved. Although metabolomics is important to understand the involved biological phenomena, the approach's ability to obtain an exhaustive description of the processes is limited. Thus, an analysis-integrated metabolomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and other omics approach is recommended. Such integration of different omics data requires specialized statistical and bioinformatics software. This review focuses on the steps involved in metabolomics research and summarizes several main tools for metabolomics analyses. We also outline the most abnormal metabolic pathways in several cancers and diseases, and discuss the importance of multi-omics integration algorithms. Overall, our goal is to summarize the current metabolomics analysis workflow and its main analysis software to provide useful insights for researchers to establish a preferable pipeline of metabolomics or multi-omics analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available