4.7 Review

Mesenchymal stem cell treatment for COVID-19

Journal

EBIOMEDICINE
Volume 77, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103920

Keywords

COVID-19; Mesenchymal stem cell; Immune therapy; Lung injury

Funding

  1. Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [81721002]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0105700]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

SARS-CoV-2 infection has led to a global pandemic, with less than 7% of infected individuals developing severe or critical illness. In addition to antiviral medications, immunotherapies such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been explored for their potential safety and effectiveness in reducing pathological changes in the lungs.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has caused a global pandemic since late 2019 that resulted in more than 360 million population infection. Among them, less than 7% of infected individuals develop severe or critical illness. Mass vaccination has been carried out, but reinfection and vaccine breakthrough cases still occur. Besides supportive and antiviral medications, much attention has been paid in immunotherapies that aim at reducing pathological changes in the lungs. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is used as an option because of their immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and regenerative properties. As of January 16, 2022, when ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for Mesenchymal stem cells and COVID-19, over 80 clinical trials were registered. MSC therapy was found to be safe and some effective in preclinical and clinical studies. Here, we summarize the major pathological characteristics of COVID-19 and provide scientific and rational evidence for the safety and possi-ble effectiveness of MSCs in COVID-19 treatment. Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available