4.6 Article

Domiciliary Use of Chlorhexidine vs. Postbiotic Gels in Patients with Peri-Implant Mucositis: A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12062800

Keywords

dentistry; peri-implant mucositis; mechanical debridement; non-surgical peri-implant mucositis treatment; probiotics; postbiotics; chlorhexidine; implantology; randomized clinical trial

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to test a new postbiotic gel for the treatment of peri-implant mucositis. The results showed a significant decrease in mucositis indexes during the treatment period for both the postbiotic gel and chlorhexidine gel, with no significant difference between the two groups. However, the postbiotic gel showed greater improvements in different inflammatory indexes compared to the chlorhexidine gel, suggesting the need for further studies to investigate the significance of the product.
Peri-implant mucositis is a pathological condition characterized by an inflammatory process in the peri-implant soft tissues. Progression to peri-implantitis takes place in case of peri-implant bone resorption. Recently, an aid for non-surgical treatment by mechanical debridement (SRP) has been identified in probiotics. As there are no recent studies regarding their use for peri-implant mucositis, the aim of this study was to test a new postbiotic gel for this clinical condition. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial was performed. Twenty patients undergoing SRP were randomly assigned to two treatments based on the following oral gels: chlorhexidine-based Curasept Periodontal Gel (Group 1) and postbiotic-based Biorepair Parodontgel Intensive (Group 2). At baseline (T0) and after three (T1) and six (T2) months, the following peri-implant mucositis indexes were recorded: Probing Pocket Depth (PPD), Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI), Bleeding Score (BS), Marginal Mucosal Condition (MMC). A significant decrease is reported for both postbiotic and chlorhexidine for all peri-implant mucositis indices studied. Quite the opposite, no significant variation was present in intergroup comparisons. Greater improvements for BS, GBI and MMC inflammatory indices of the postbiotic gel compared to chlorhexidine suggest the importance of further studies to investigate the relevance of the product alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available